Author Archive

Enterprise File Sharing – IT Jeopardy

Wednesday, February 16th, 2011

Promoted as the biggest contest of “man vs. machine” since Deep Blue took on Kasparov, this week’s Jeopardy face-off betwen Watson, IBM’s computer creation, and the show’s previous grand champions is great entertainment. Regardless of who, or what ultimately wins, it’s a thought provoking experiment and spectacle.

I checked out the New York Times online link to play a personal, one-on-one game of Jeopardy against Watson. I was reasonably sharp on “Historic Fashion” and “What me Worry?” but Watson had the edge on “Before and Now” and “A Musical Pastiche”. For each question, whether you get it right or wrong, Watson provides details on what it would have answered and the other possible answers it considered. For example:

Question: This 19th-century dress support is a synonym for excited activity; don’t be alarmed if there’s one in your hedgerow
Answer: Bustle
Other Answers Watson considered: Boot, Bodice, Crinoline

It got me thinking about questions that might give Watson or the other contestants an advantage.  Recognizing that Watson is after all a computer, it probably has the edge on any computer, IT-related questions – you would think.  In tribute to this great computer experiment/media stunt, here’s our proposed question category with some sample questions.  Too easy you may say, but try asking these questions within your organization. May the best human/machine win.

Category – Enterprise File Sharing

Question: Information that takes up most of the storage on an email system?
Answer: Files

Question: A small device, named after part of the hand, used to transport files, easy to lose?
Answer: Thumb drive

Question: Healthcare regulation that restricts the sharing of personal health information?
Answer: HIPAA

Question:  An event that typically makes headline news involving the loss of information?
Answer: Data Breach

European Data Protection Supervisor Recommends Regulation…

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011

I just read the recent “Opinion” from the European Data Protection Supervisor on the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.  Are you still with me?  Hang in there, because it’s easy to get lost in this story.

On January 14, 2011 the European Data Protection Supervisor, Peter Hustinx, gave his written opinion regarding the Review of the Data Protection Legal Framework and he gave it a qualified thumbs up – I think?

Here is the text …

“Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – A comprehensive approach on personal data protection in the European Union”

…and then follows 36 pages in total, which you can read here.

The “Opinion” only came out this week and I noticed a scarcity of people have jumped in yet and distilled this “Opinion” down to anything that the rest of us simpletons can understand. Fortunately this morning I woke up to the V3.co.uk article entitled “EU data protection supervisor backs new law”.  It looks like a qualified “thumbs up” is a good assessment.

In my quest to understand this “opinion” I did also find interesting links to the European Data Protection Day on January 28 and an impressive program of events organized by the Council of Europe and the European Commission.  Mr. Peter Hustinx is one of the featured speakers.  Hopefully his speech will provide the simplified version of what he was trying to say.

In the meantime – I’m taking his “Opinion” as a thumbs-up for data-protection in the European Union – and that’s good news.

FAX Data Breach Gets Costly

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

We are getting ready to move offices and the topic of the FAX number came up in our pre-move planning session. The claim was made that no-one uses the FAX machine any more.

I imagine the Hertfordshire County Council in England wishes their employees also hadn’t used the FAX machine. The County Council just got slapped with a £100,000 fine by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO) in the UK after a data breach originating at the FAX machine in June 2010. As reported last week in SC Magazine, employees in the childcare litigation department FAXed information to the wrong recipients on two separate occasions.  The size of the fine was determined in part because the two incidents were 13 days apart and the County Council failed to take sufficient steps to prevent the second breach. Sometimes people over think the solution – unplugging the FAX machine would have done the trick.

We’ve written before about the security hazards of the multi-function copier, scanner, printer in Digital Time Bombs. After hearing about this latest data breach perhaps we should ditch the FAX machine in the move.

Cloud Killer – Qu’est-ce Que C’est

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

What are the 3 surefire ways to kill a cloud project:

  1. Not understanding compliance
  2. Betting on the wrong horse
  3. Not including IT

Thanks to David Linthicum for his recent excellent short article “3 surefire ways to kill a cloud project.”

These 3 cloud killers are particularly relevant to deployment of secure file transfer in the cloud.  I thought it would be worth reviewing how Accellion defends against these cloud killers:

1. Not understanding compliance – It’s all about compliance

From Accellion’s perspective it’s all about compliance.  Ensuring compliance is foremost in any secure file transfer deployment, whether it be on-premise or in-the-cloud.  Since Accellion secure file transfer deployments can span on-premise and in-the-cloud we have implemented comprehensive data protection features to provide the control, tracking and reporting necessary to demonstrate compliance.

• Data in Motion - To protect the data moving through the Accellion secure file transfer system Accellion provides not only business level authentication but also encryption for data in motion.  Data is transferred using the Secure Socket Layer (SSL) protocol including 128 bit encryption, and Accellion includes additional file encryption capabilities before upload using the AES 128 bit encryption scheme.
• Data at Rest - Accellion provides disk encryption using 128 bit encryption to protect stored data. File names are de-referenced when stored by the Accellion secure file transfer system to ensure that files are inaccessible on the server.

2. Betting on the wrong horse – Betting on the right horse

Accellion utilizes the Amazon Web Services AWS Cloud Computing Platform to deliver our hosted Cloud Accellion Secure File Transfer service.  We picked Amazon Cloud because of its SAS70 Type II Certified Data Centers, 99.5% annual uptime service levels and its global distribution of data centers designed to anticipate and tolerate failure while maintaining service levels.  We think we are betting on the right horse, however we also give our customers the option to deploy Accellion secure file transfer in the cloud of their choice, either public or private.

3. Not including IT – Including IT

Accellion believes that ensuring data security and compliance should not be left to business users.  We don’t support adoption of rogue applications, in fact we think they are particularly hazardous for file transfer. Allowing business users to utilize free online file sharing services provides no visibility or control of the flow of enterprise information. At Accellion we work closely with IT organizations to deploy secure file transfer systems and provision business users to keep enterprise data transfer safe.

Thanks again David for the tips on staying away from 3 common cloud killers.

Accidentally-sent email could end up costing UBS $10 million

Monday, November 15th, 2010

Ouch.  That headline is just not good, anyway you look at it.  As reported in an SC Magazine article today “An email sent in error that contained details of General Motors’ upcoming flotation could have cost Swiss Bank UBS an estimated $10 million.”

This data security lapse appears to have resulted in UBS being dropped as an underwriter for the plan by GM’s owners to sell $10bn in common stock on November 18, to partially payback some of the $50bn US Government bail-out the company received during the financial crisis.

This mistake should never have been allowed to happen.  While humans do make mistakes, there are any number of IT security systems that could have prevented or reduced the risk of this mistake.  Let’s review some obvious ones:

•  Any communications on such a large financial deal should have been sent securely, requiring user authentication.
•  Content monitoring and filtering software could have flagged the email for sensitive information and quarantined the email until it had been approved for sending.
•  Sending sensitive financial information via secure file transfer would have allowed the download link to be deactivated once the error was detected.
•  Sending sensitive information via secure file transfer would also have resulted in a return receipt from any unintended recipients allowing earlier detection and reduction of further downloads.

It’s very hard to understand why at least one of these data security systems was not in place to mitigate the risk. With the size of financial transactions that are at stake, it seems a wise and prudent investment for financial institutions to put in place IT safeguards against human error.  While email is wonderfully accessible and easy to use for business users, it is far too easy to make an inadvertent mistake that unfortunately can have significant financial implications.

At Accellion we help a large number of financial institutions, including the Bank of Scotland, Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin and Deloitte & Touche, protect their confidential information with secure file transfer solutions that reduce the financial risk of business user mistakes.  We understand that to err is human.

What Would Larry Do?

Wednesday, November 10th, 2010

Rawn Shah in his recent Forbes blog article entitled “A Road Trip Through Different Views on Collaborative Work” explored the idea of collaboration personae as a vehicle for understanding how a category of users behave when they need to collaborate.  The use of personae to humanize the effort of understanding how users behave is not a new one but it is valuable.  Rather than thinking about how a generic user might behave it’s helpful to give the user a name and title.

Which leads us to Larry. “Larry is the on-site project manager who works with the various construction crews, building engineers and architects.” So what would Larry do if he needed to share construction documents with his project team?


Earlier in his career Larry would typically have sent, via mail, photocopies of the original hand drawn construction drawings.  Imagine a long tube with a mailing label – too awkward a shape to fit in a mail box, so mailing required a trip to the post office. So what did Larry do when there were changes to the drawings? How did Larry keep all the team members aware of all adjustments to the original design?  The answer is he didn’t and he couldn’t. Out on the construction site, Larry’s team members would unfurl their copy of the construction drawings and mark with a stubby pencil any changes directly on the drawings. Using the mail and hard copy drawings added a tremendous overhead and risk to any construction project.

Fast forward to 2010 and what would Larry do?  Today with accessibility to the Internet Larry is now able to share digital drawings with his team members in minutes not days.  Using secure file transfer he can now send digital files up to 50GB in size, and receive a return receipt when they have been received and downloaded.  At the launch of a project, all team members can receive the initial drawings, as updates are made they can be easily shared with team members.  Team members can even view digital drawings in the field, in real-time on hand-held devices.  Not only are there significant time and cost savings in how Larry shares information today, but also there is greatly reduced risk that any team member is using out of date documents.

Today many Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) companies use Accellion secure file transfer to streamline their work, including Carollo Engineers, EMCOR, Foster Wheeler, Golder, Kleinfelder, TMAD Taylor & Gaines, and Perini.  We are happy to be helping the Larry’s of the world.

IT Nostalgia – Is it A Thing of the Past?

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

I read an interesting blog post recently entitled “Three Ways to Market Nostalgia in Social Communities.” As someone who has enjoyed more than a few good moments of nostalgia I thought maybe this topic would provide fertile ground for discussion.  Apparently products from the past are in vogue, such as retro versions of Pepsi and Coke, but does this have any relevance to IT?

While I can understand someone enjoying the nostalgic connection with Frosted Flakes’ Tony the Tiger saying “They’re Gr-r-reat!” is there anyone out there yearning for the days of 20,000 vacuum tubes and the Eniac Computer or the FORTRAN computer language or the Pong computer game – okay on the last one I admit a small tinge of nostalgia.  Is there anything we miss about the past in IT? Computer Cards, Room-size computers, the floppy disk?

And by inference does this mean that everything new in IT is good?  One of the challenges with IT is the pace of progress.  Products and technologies are being rapidly superceded so where does that leave the IT staff and the vendors who are trying to keep pace?

At Accellion we have experienced first hand the widespread adoption of virtual and cloud environments and the rapidly changing landscape for IT deployments.  Since we introduced the industry’s first virtual appliance for secure file transfer back in November 2007, now more than 80% of Accellion secure file transfer deployments are into virtual environments.  Originally we supported just VMware, and have since added support for Citrix XenServer and also most recently Microsoft Hyper-V.  And we see the same steep adoption curve happening this year with cloud deployments.

Today, deployment of Accellion secure file transfer can take just minutes and that’s a good thing for everyone. Some of our earliest customers from 2005 and 2006 are now replacing their original Accellion physical appliances with virtual and/or cloud deployments – it’s great to see them enjoying a whole new flavor of Accellion.

Are we nostalgic for the time when we were on first name terms with the FedEX guy, shipping large volumes of physical servers out to our customers – no way.

Guinness World Record for Largest File Transfer?

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

We’ve had an ongoing debate at Accellion on what is the largest size of file that can be sent via Accellion file transfer.  Yesterday’s WSJ article entitled “Fastest Growing PR Stunt:  Get Into Guinness Records” settles the discussion – we’re going for the record.  Of course setting this record could take a while, since there is in fact no hard limit of the size of file that can be sent via Accellion.

We know anecdotally, and from usage reports, that our customers successfully send files as large as 100GB, even 200GB, via Accellion, which is much larger than the stated 50GB maximum size for files and file folders.  But just how big a file can you send via Accellion?  I have a feeling this question might fall into the category of “How long is a piece of string?.”  It all depends. On the one hand there is no hard limit on the size of the file you can send via Accellion but on the other hand you have to consider little details such as available network bandwidth.

I checked out the Guinness World Records website for instructions on how to apply for a new record. Of course it was easy to get distracted by the picture of the Most Straws in the Mouth (400 for 10 seconds).

If I can get your attention back from the picture of “Most Straws in a Mouth”, let us know if you have access to an unlimited bandwidth network and a REALLY BIG file you need to send, there could be a record in the making.

The File Transfer Minimalist

Monday, September 20th, 2010

Today’s blog is a personal musing on art, simplicity, minimalism and making your customers happy.

Yesterday I caught the last day of the Fisher Exhibition at SFMOMA. Amazingly I found a parking spot, even though Oracle World was kicking-off across the street and the Giants were playing the Brewers at ATT Park. The Fisher Collection is the private art collection of Doris and Don Fisher, the founders of Gap Inc.. Who would have thought selling denim and chinos would lead to one of the world’s leading collections of contemporary art, including works from Calder, Warhol, Kiefer, Diebenkorn and many more? My favorite pieces? The Calder mobiles – the motion and simplicity appeals to the engineer in me.

calder

On the floor below the Fisher Collection was The Anniversary Show celebrating 75 years of SFMOMA and displaying more than four hundred works from the collection. Now while I’m a fan of simplicity, it can be taken too far.  One of the more baffling art pieces on display is entitled White Painting (3 Panels) by Robert Rauschenberg. Yes you’ve guessed it, it’s a white painting in 3 panels. The White Painting is so minimal it’s in serious danger of having no there, there.

whitepainting

For me, the best Art is like the best Technology, it shouldn’t need explaining. If we had to compare Accellion to a piece of contemporary art, think Calder mobile not Rauschenberg’s White Painting. At Accellion we are aiming for simplicity not bafflement. With that thought, I’ll wrap up my comments on art, simplicity and minimalism and leave you with a compliment we received on Friday from a prospective customer that seems topical…

“Hey guys, 

I just wanted you to know that I am really taking a liking to your product… I have never had anything up and running so quickly as Accellion.  Of all the solutions I have tested the last few months I am stunned at the minimal time necessary to get Accellion up and running… There is nothing I like better than implementing a solution that makes me look good to my users!”

Fashion Week – IT Needs to Strut its Stuff

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Reading this week’s coverage of NY’s Fashion Week makes me yearn for opportunities to use adjectives such as “periwinkle”.  The LA Times writeup on the Tommy Hilfiger show Hilfiger Goes Over the Hedge included this adjective laden sentence “The collection was grounded in the blue hues — the requisite navy blue joined by shades of periwinkle and light blue, which found their way into Bengal stripes, checks, plaids and seersuckers — and white (tennis, anyone?) with cheery pops of reds, yellows and pinks throughout.”

When was the last time I got to write about “seersucker”?

Apart from Apple Computer, with their signature designs, does anyone in the IT industry really get this idea that technology can be beautiful?  Does anyone care?  Yeah I know IT is mostly a man’s world but perhaps there would be more women in IT if we injected a little more fashion into the world of software and hardware.

Imagine opening a beautiful periwinkle blue gift box containing your newest server.  Your software arrives in a translucent, shimmering CD case.  You eagerly upload the latest software upgrade to see this season’s UI colors and themes.

IT needs to strut its stuff a little more and it starts here.

For our Spring Collection, Accellion will be featuring bold colors, strong lines and folds of software with interesting embellishments, punctuated with a shocking display of features.